The articles of association of a hybrid can provide for the appointment of a Protector (in the same manner as trusts) where the Protector
supervises the directors and whose authority is required, inter alia, to elect members and to dispose of assets.
"The first class will be the registered members (or shareholders) who will be the controlling members
The second class will be the beneficial members whose identities are not in the public domain and who are the only persons entitled to share in the profits of the company although distributions from the company can only be authorised by the directors"
It seems that there are shareholder members and benificiary members. Shares are assets is this why Mirasol has been sequestered
however....
"The Guarantee Memberships would be issued on terms that they carry no rights to vote but all the rights to participate in the income and capital of the company. Thus all control rests with the shareholders but all benefits flow to the Guarantee Members. The shares can be issued to professional managers, who therefore act as quasi trustees, but unlike normal shareholders they cannot receive financial benefit from holding the shares. All financial benefits flow to the Guarantee Members who are therefore in a position not unlike the beneficiaries of a classical trust structure."
We really need to find out the legal relationship of Mirasol and how exactly it was setup and what the Articles of Association say. Who's going to give us that info?